Overview

This week will focus on outlining how the program will work, answering any questions you have, and setting intentions for the program.

We’ll start by having short icebreaker 1-on-1 conversations to get to know the other fellows. There’s a large diversity of ages, educational backgrounds, and disciplines among the fellows, and we hope that these discussions are an opportunity to appreciate this diversity and recognise that we all have a unique perspective to contribute to the discussions.

We will also work on developing discussion norms within each cohort. This will include things such as how to disagree with each other in a productive way, emphasizing that expressing confusion is important and valuable for the whole group, and tips on ensuring we understand each other’s points.

We think having productive discussions is important so have presented what we think are some helpful ways to approach the program below.

Before the session, we’ll do an exercise which will help us find our questions and uncertainties about improving the world. We’ll investigate these questions during the program.

Ways to Approach the Program

Taking ideas seriously.

• Typically, conversations about ideas are like recreational diversions: we enjoy batting around interesting thoughts and saying smart things, and then we go back to doing whatever we were already doing in our lives.
• This is a fine thing to do — but in this program we expect the ideas to affect our actions as altruists. We think we should take a curious action-guided mindset by asking ourselves questions like:
  • “How could I tell if this idea were true?”
  • “If it is true, what does that imply I should be doing differently in my life? What else does it imply I’m wrong about?”
  • And, zooming out: “Where are my blind spots? Which important questions should I be thinking about that I’m not? Which people should I be talking to?”
• In other words, taking ideas seriously means treating our worldview as something that affects outcomes in the world we care about — and therefore, wanting to make our worldview as full and accurate as possible.

Disagreements are useful.

• When thoughtful people with access to the same information reach very different conclusions from each other, we should be curious about why. Often we tend to be incurious about this simply because it’s so common that we’re used to it.
• But if, for example, a medical community is divided on whether Treatment A or B does a better job of curing some disease, they should want to get to the bottom of that disagreement, because the right answer matters — lives are at stake.

Strong opinions, weakly held.

• Often people abstain from trying to have opinions about things because they think things like “I’m not an expert” or “It’s hard to know for sure.”
• Instead, during this program, we invite you to be bold enough to venture guesses, expressed clearly enough such that it’s easy for someone else, or evidence about the world, to prove you wrong.
• This doesn’t need to mean that you are confident. It is useful to express beliefs you’re only 25% sure of (and to say that you’re unsure).
• However, it is easier to clear up uncertainty if you can talk about your uncertain guess as easily as you can talk about something you’re sure of.